For this response post, I have focused on Kate Nelson’s blog about Blog Post #3
Your blog post does a fantastic job of breaking down Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and illustrating how its principles can create more inclusive learning environments. I particularly appreciate how you emphasize the shift from reactive accommodations to proactive course design—this is a crucial perspective that many educators overlook. Your real-life classroom example was especially engaging, particularly your discussion on physical layout and access to technology. These are often neglected barriers that can significantly impact student engagement.
One area you could explore further is how students themselves can advocate for UDL-friendly changes. While instructors play a key role, student feedback and peer collaboration can also drive accessibility improvements. Discussing strategies for students to effectively communicate these concerns could add another dimension to your argument.
Overall, this was a well-articulated and insightful post. You successfully argue that UDL is not just about removing obstacles but about fostering a learning space where every student can thrive.